what the bleep do we know debunked what the bleep do we know debunked

Cast. Everyone said that you have to see this movie! So I did. Hard to get your head around What the Bleep Do We Know. They want suggestions, not formulas. One possible answer: they go to an alternative universe where people are asking the same question: 'where'd they go?'" Use this form to email 'What the bleep are they on about?' His 73 papers are mostly about supersymmetric GUTs and considered quite respectable, with a total of over 5000 citations, including 641 citations for one of them alone. Since its release in April 2004, this independent film has become a cult hit, playing to packed houses and grossing over $7.5 . As the layers to her everyday experiences fall away insertions in the story with scientists, and philosophers and religious leaders . Once anything goes, you can have anything you want. So on one hand you have a threat to security, and on the other you have a possible boon for security. Last night I went to see a movie which was advertised as being about quantum physics, called What the Bleep Do We Know?. I don't know how many times I've heard people say, "Oh, I love quantum mechanics because I'm really into meditation, or I love the spiritual benefits that it brings me." She works as a free-lancer for an agency, where her boss is played by Barry Newman. You dont have a Christian Science Monitor The Effect of Meditation on Violent Crime in Washington, DC. Often, people who are trying to sell whatever it is they're trying to sell try to justify it on the basis of science. By continuing to browse the site 5.Miceal Ledwith a clergyman with a rather dubious past (see http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565) is the one chosen by the film makers to be the theological spokesman. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/faith (accessed: April 20, 2009)A note about Fred Wolf's qualifications: He has a Ph.D in Theoretical Physics from UCLA in 1963, although he has not worked in laboratory endeavours since that time. The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Nasa found something. And in fact we can make weird quantum phenomena happen. You should be wary whenever you hear something like, "Quantum mechanics connects you with the universe" or "quantum mechanics unifies you with everything else." Im not personally familiar with any of Hagelins work but Im sure theres some good physics in there. Right now they use a key that's based on the products of large prime numbers, and no computer could determine the prime factors in a time shorter than the age of the universe. Update: More information at the end of the video description.Comment approval now removed. Our work isn't possible without your support. [an error occurred while processing this directive]. [18] A BBC reviewer described it as "a documentary aimed at the totally gullible". Is that last line The fact that someone who spouts such utter nonsense can get a Ph.D. from Harvard and be one of the most widely cited authors on supersymmetric models is pretty remarkable some sort of strange attack on SUSY models? We're bombarded by many things every second of the day, and a result, we're not specially prepared quantum mechanical systems, nor can we exert weird quantum powers over other objects. What the bleep do we know debunked Isn't life great? One has already been recognized: If we do carefully prepare quantum systems, and keep them isolated, we can perform quantum magic technologically potentially on scales that we haven't been able to do before. Fred Allen Wolf According to Joo Magueijo, professor in theoretical physics at Imperial College, the film deliberately misquotes science. What could be worse than being aware of every tiny detail that your brain handles from phosphate levels to heart rate and hair growth. They're coming into the marketplace hungry for direction, but they don't want some person who claims to have all the answers. It's certainly not. During our current Covid19 pandemic, this collection is highly relevant to a world still seeking novel answers to the human condition and also drawn to old theories long ago debunked. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser. To date, there has been no response as to where the information which lead to the story about the indians not being able to see the ships of Columbus originated from. Gripping stuff, but nothing to do with our daily lives. You are free to comment as you wish. And most thoughtful members of the "spiritual but not religious" camp would take issue if you chopped off their big toes and then responded to their complaints with a lofty "it's all in your mind." [5], According to the makers of the film, "Bleep" is an expurgation of "fuck". Marlee Matlin, Barry Newman, Elaine Hendrix. Well, people are able to undergo various transformations. It's there. to someone you know: You may or may not believe that there's an external reality beyond what your brain creates; the topic will be a perennial and fertile source of discussion. Cathleen Falsani, who must have been taking notes while I was staring gobsmacked at the screen, quotes the 35,year-old . Q: Some scientists, such as Sir Roger Penrose, have talked about neurons as quantum systems. "Our brain receives 400 billion bits/second of information, but we're only aware of 2000 bits/second. He claims the drop was achieved. To some extent it could be, because memories and thoughts are stored at the molecular level, and at a molecular level quantum mechanics is significant. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time students of Ramthas School of enlightenment. But sounding like magic and being magic are two different things. It'd be like being the CEO of a massive company and having to listen to what every single employee was doing every minute of every day. What the Bleep Do We Know draws heavily on the role of the observer in quantum physics. Q. Quantum mechanics may play a role at some level in the way the brain works just as it may play a role in photosynthesis. In the letter, the authors write: "the movie illustrates the uncertainty principle with a bouncing basketball being in several places at once. It comes from the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, and it's about the limitations of trying to measure the position and momentum of subatomic particles this only applies to sub-atomic particlesa rock doesn't need you to bump into it to exist. A roommate of mine was interested in TM and I think it was he who introduced us. During the Fall of the year Amanda begins to see the world in new and different ways when she begins to question her role in life, her relationships with her career and men and what it all means. What the Bleep Do We Know was directed and produced by Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente and William Arntz, all of whom were students of Ramtha's School of Enlightenment. "[3] It offers alternative spirituality views characteristic of New Age philosophy, including critiques of the competing claims of stewardship among traditional religions [viz., institutional Judaism, Christianity, and Islam] of universally recognized and accepted moral values. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for What the Bleep Do We Know? There appears to be no evidence to support this claim. Simon Singh called it pseudoscience and said the suggestion "that if observing water changes its molecular structure, and if we are 90% water, then by observing ourselves we can change at a fundamental level via the laws of quantum physics" was "ridiculous balderdash". It took a while, but the comparison finally came through on the association of strings, as a quantum mechanical perspective, and the relationship to that movie. 8. is god-awful. Then we segue to a narrative starring Amanda (Marlee Maitlin), a wedding photographer who's bummed because her slimy husband cheated on her. What the Bleep!? Even though there's lots of proof that the Moon landing happened, some people don't . To date, Dr Emoto has not taken up the challenge. This is one reason physicists studying a subatomic particle create large numbers of them in particle accelerators. (Physicists should take part of the blame for this confusion. Do We (K)now!? And there's the matter of scale the brain lights up in scans much more brightly when you're seeing something than when you're reminiscing. We're not using either superconductivity or superfluidity yet on the scale that I think people thought we might. One of the scientists who was in the film and had never appeared at the school is Dr David Albert Professor and Director of Philosophical Physics at Columbia university. But the movie gradually moves to quantum 'insights' that lead a woman to toss away her antidepressant medication, to the quantum channeling of Ramtha, the 35,000-year-old Lemurian warrior, and on to even greater nonsense." Around 650 million people watched the moment on television. Hope you dont mind me butting in, just thought you might like to see these facts which are so far undisputed about the film. Photos View All Photos Movie Info Amanda, a divorced photographer, has a fantastic experience when life begins to unravel around her, revealing the cellular,. The general idea was that since quantum mechanics supposedly says that there isnt one reality, but an infinite number of possibilities, one just has to be enlightened to an awareness of this, and then you can make whatever you want happen. you are agreeing to our, One month free trial to theMonitorDaily, Staff writer of The Christian Science Monitor, Performance of quantum computer no better than ordinary PC, say analysts, 'Spooky' physics: How quantum entanglement could link wormholes, Quantum 'teleportation' distance record broken. If we don't understand classical consciousness, how can we understand quantum consciousness? Where were we now? As a series of scientists and scientist types take a wayward stab at explaining quantum theory -- it seems to involve being in two places at once -- "What the Bleep," which opens nationwide today . She does play a large role in the movie and you can read all about her nonsense here. Dr Joe Dispenza (the one who creates his day) has gone to court and testified that his teacher (ramtha) has told him that terrible times are coming and that he needs to protect his family. It's recognized as pedagogical exaggeration. And if you're a modern thinker you'll know for a fact that quantum physics is wacky stuff. Filmed in Portland, Oregon, What the Bleep Do We Know!? Dr Dispenza claims (correctly) in the movie that brain scans PET (Positron Emission Tomography) and Functional MRI (Magnetic Resonance Imaging) show that the same part of your brain lights up whether you're looking at something or just remembering it. Who believe, in all kinds of things(God maybe?). Early in the film, she is trying to take portraits at the train station, but nobody seems to be buying. Some movies are so bad, they're funny. And I came out of wanting to meditate more often, which can't be a bad thing. [6], The Institute of Noetic Sciences, a New Age research organization that "explores phenomena that do not necessarily fit conventional scientific models", has supported What the Bleep Do We Know!? A disproportionate amount of time was given in voice and film to Ramtha, Dr. Joe dispenza, and Miceal Ledwith. Quantum mechanics, the theoretical framework of contemporary physics, is a probability algorithm. http://unison.ie/irish_independent/stories.php3?ca=36&si=770458&issue_id=7565, http://dftuz.unizar.es/~rivero/research/simple.pdf, Not Even Wrong Blog Archive Down the Rabbit Hole. The article states that the domestic gross exceeded $10 million, described as not bad for a low-budget documentary, and that the DVD release attained even more significant success with over a million units shipped in the first six months following its release in March 2005. "What the Bleep" begins in NOVA-like fashion: galaxies swirl and scientists--we aren't told who they are until the end--expound on quantum mechanics and the nature of the universe. We may be able to use quantum communication in ways that we haven't done before. "What the Bleep" misses opportunities to focus credibly on the fascinating work people like Newberg have been doing, and makes the science-and-faith field seem like quackery. Miceal Ledwith During the resulting chat, two men carrying a wooden door passed between the stranger and the subjects. "They take advantage of things we don't know very well or can't test very well, then use it in an unfair way," notes Andr de Gouva, a particle physicist at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill. " " " !". All the weirdness of quantum mechanics gets washed out on the scale that we can experience. When they use the word 'observe', they actually mean 'interact with', not look at or think about.). up and at each step we're eliminating information and finally what is bubbling up to consciousness is the one that is most self-serving. So what better thing to have than something that gives you everything you want? On this Wikipedia the language links are at the top of the page across from the article title. Whether or not you buy into its "you are God in the making" philosophy, "What the Bleep Do We Know?" We We'd like to be able to influence things just by thinking about them, we'd like to transport ourselves elsewhere without getting on an airplane. I had it recommended to me by no less than three people. But to insist, as one on-screen interviewee does, that the material world around us is just one "possible movement of consciousness" undermines the possibility of any objective, external reality--something fundamental to many religions and to science. A movie and a book said that water molecules are. Awash in New Age theorizing, real world science and the intellectually unfathomable notion of quantum mechanics, What the 'Bleep' Do We Know!? Our mind has enormous potential, but we only use a small part of it for conscious thought, and we miss a lot of what's going on around us. But how are ordinary mortals to judge its assertions about the nature of matter, mind, and the universe? Professor Clive Greated wrote that "thinking on neurology and addiction are covered in some detail but, unfortunately, early references in the film to quantum physics are not followed through, leading to a confused message". Q: But isn't everything really connected? His list of "worst abusers" includes inspirational author Deepak Chopra, the best-selling book "The Secret" and the whole field of Transcendental Meditation. [2]. That would be, very hard to quantify:). The question is, how far down the rabbit hole, do you wanna go? This website uses cookies to "What the Bleep Do We Know," a pseudoscientific docudrama that purports to link quantum mechanics and consciousness, would be a riot if people didn't take it so seriously. But when animated, jive-talkin' human cells start dancing around in what appears to be the heroine's frontal lobe, all questions of spirituality pale before the sheer dreadfulness of this movie. is a book of amazing science, and now the international bestselling book is available in paperback. But whenever one is dealing with highly speculative ideas that have no connection with experiment, theres a danger of becoming delusional and thinking that youre doing real science when youre not. 1. A classic experiment on visual processing involves asking people to watch a video of 6 people passing a basketball, and press a button every time a particular team has possession. Guess that could not have been done to easily in the Catholic church. That beliefs about who one is and what is real are a direct cause of oneself and of one's own realities. But when the ramblings about quantum physics start merging with fridge magnet philosophy, it's time for a little reality checking. [9] In his review, Dave Kehr of The New York Times described the "transition from quantum mechanics to cognitive therapy" as "plausible", but stated also that "the subsequent leapfrom cognitive therapy into large, hazy spiritual beliefsisn't as effectively executed. . There's just this little matter of the science being a bit bleep. Bleep raises thought-provoking questions about science and its relationship to spirituality and metaphysics. [13] The American Chemical Society's review criticizes the film as a "pseudoscientific docudrama", saying "Among the more outlandish assertions are that people can travel backward in time, and that matter is actually thought. What the Bleep Do We Know postulates the existence of a spiritual connection between the realms of quantum physics and consciousness, demonstrating this through inspiring visual effects, story-telling and interviews with experts. On August 1, 2006 What the Bleep! This message will appear once per week They may applaud the central tenets of the movie, but not its disjointed narrative, clunky acting, bizarre thematic segues, and faux "facts." Blending New Age mysticism and quantum physics, What The Bleep Do We Know?! I guess the difference between me and those other people is that I actually have some grasp on the concepts that the movie was trying to talk about. In addition to the films three directors, there were actors and others involved in the production who are long time "students" of Ramthas' School of enlightenment. D (k)ow!? Staff meetings are tedious enough give me a conscious mind with a decent filter device any day. It is true that quantum mechanics is extremely strange, and on extremely small scales for short times, all sorts of weird things happen. 3. On the other hand, one finds 3+1, or more concretely inverse square law, to be mathematically peculiar when it refers to gravity, ie when mass is the source of the force. For traditional Christians, God is God not because your brain is making him up, but because he is. "I create my own reality, says quantum physics," intones one expert, and the viewer could be lured to accept this as proof. Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed and 2. And while I'm no quantum physicist, my yoga teacher a big fan of the movie was starting to sound like she was. Not everything is possible. Tags: science-and-technology, neuroscience, physics. Then comes "Carl Sagan Meets Madame Blavatsky." Free delivery for many products. !" is a radical departure from convention. "What the Bleep Do We Know," as it is referred to for convenience, is not a conventional documentary about quantum physics. "[15], Bernie Hobbs, a science writer with ABC Science Online, explains why the film is incorrect about quantum physics and reality: "The observer effect of quantum physics isn't about people or reality. Quantum mechanics is a replacement for the phrase "anything goes." I want to mention another point Maharishi Mahesh Yogi. Given a few contextual clues, like whether the eyelids are open or shut, it can work out whether it's seeing something or remembering it. But it's not true for the universe at large. I think of what Niels Bohr said to Wolfgang Pauli about theories that are "not crazy enough to be true." But when you hear about quantum mechanics and consciousness, you should assume the author is a crackpot unless proven otherwise. They don't go anywhere, Fred. 4000 volunteers regularly meditated to achieve a 25% drop in violent crime by the end of summer. So far, so good. [4] The visual-effects team, led by Evan Jacobs, worked closely with the other film-makers to create visual metaphors that would capture the essence of the film's technical subjects with attention to aesthetic detail. The experts start "proving" that humans create their own reality by getting too attached to certain brain chemicals. 19802023 The Christian Science Monitor. subscription yet. ), is hooked on prescription pills, and mopes about while her chirpy roommate spatters paint around their apartment. Invariably only about half the people tested ever notice a woman in a gorilla suit walking across the middle of the screen during the game. The host of the show said this was done because it was negative He points out that Gallo et al anounced that AIDS is caused by HIV at a press conference, without there being a single paper published in a scientific journal substantiating this. 6. He announced in 1994 (one year after the study) that violent crime had decreased 18%. "Physical reality is absolutely rock solid, yet it only comes into existence when it bumps up against another piece of physical reality like us, or a rock." If you want to affect something in the external world, you have to do something to it. With quantum mechanics, there's a notion that observers affect the things that they're observing. Despite his caveats, he recommends that people see the film, stating: "I hope it develops into a cult movie in the UK as it has in the US. Yet, the battle still ranges, and we now know where we can class the distinctions of LQG and String theorists? Even so it notched up $10m in. Perhaps that is why they couldnt see them. The film has been described as an example of quantum mysticism, and has been criticized for both misrepresenting science and containing pseudoscience. But we're certainly using them at the Large Hadron Collider, which we couldn't even operate if we didn't have superconducting magnets. Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. It's truly amazing that you can separate two elementary particles that were originally tied together, and often make a measurement of one particle that instantly affects the other, even if it's on Alpha Centauri. You'll even applaud the wedding Polka scene there's just not enough Eastern European folk culture in contemporary film. "Quantum physics calculates only possibilities Who/what chooses among these possibilities to bring the actual event of experience? In addition, the film mentioned clipper ships which were not even in existence at that time. The whole thing is really moronic beyond belief. Down The Rabbit Hole\". Presentations ranging from "The Secret" to "What the Bleep Do We Know?" The director, William Arntz, has described What the Bleep as a film for the "metaphysical left". We're such a shallow people. 2) "What the Bleep Do We Know" has sure got a lot of people talking and thinking. Human everyday life consists of many routines and necessary things that are mostly physical such as work, school, a number of chores or minor responsibilities, and hopefully sleep. You can't just hope for the best. He has stated in several venues that his views were totally misrepresented in the film. does a reasonable job of presenting some of these quandaries, researchers say. kazakore (kazakore) January 14, 2010, 6:30pm #10 ?, never before seen DVD programming features, 20 minutes of new animation, new interviews, along with 5 hours of uncut interviews and a filmmakers Q&A, the Quantum Edition contains over 15 hours of material on 6 DVD sides. Some argue that the same quantum processes seen in the universe around us have an effect on consciousness as well, but physicist Lawrence Krauss says that's highly debatable. A: Of course it does. Sol. (commonly referred to by its spoken title What the Bleep Do We Know) is a 2004 pseudoscientific film that supports the idea that consciousness and quantum mechanics are somehow related. Easton's 1897 Bible Dictionary. To accomplish that, you would have to invoke "new physics," Dr. Schumm says, in which the explanation can be verified or falsified through experiment. He says he is "profoundly unsympathetic to attempts at linking quantum mechanics with consciousness".[1]. Fred Alan Wolf, PhD in What the Bleep Do We Know? yeago works Blog Archive Jesus, Buddha, Ken Wilber?? As he told ABC's "This Week" the day after the debate: "When it . The film surpassed all expectations; it was certainly the stupidest thing I can remember seeing in a movie theater, and thats saying quite a lot (I see a lot of movies). "But that's two leaps beyond what scientists believe to be true.". We asked some of Britain's best scientific brains to give us their verdicts, Original reporting and incisive analysis, direct from the Guardian every morning. subscription. asks nothing but . Quantum physics tells us that reality isn't fixed subatomic particles only come into existence when they are observed, 2. You can't bring good things to you by thinking about them. [14] Amongst the assertions in the film that have been challenged are that water molecules can be influenced by thought (as popularized by Masaru Emoto), that meditation can reduce violent crime rates of a city,[15] and that quantum physics implies that "consciousness is the ground of all being." Otherwise, the process falls "outside the realm of physical statements and has entered the realm of spiritual belief.". The quantum mechanical correlations, the spooky action at a distance that quantum mechanics brings up, is true only for very specially prepared systems that are isolated from the rest of the world, completely. The idea that our own perceptions can't be trusted is not new, of course. (2005)", "Cult Science Dressing Up Mysticism as Quantum Physics", "The New Age Spiritualist and the Old School Scholars", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=What_the_Bleep_Do_We_Know!%3F&oldid=1139210194, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License 3.0, That the universe is best seen as constructed from thoughts and ideas rather than from. Q: You do see that in some science . Hambling says it is likely that both the Hughes account and the story told by Pert were exaggerations of the records left by Captain Cook and the botanist Joseph Banks. This is the person who teaches the brain science in RSE. For starters you'd have to take a lot of samples from different parts of each ice specimen. 3. And we are certainly not isolated from the rest of the world. "[10], What the Bleep Do We Know!? Joe Dispenza, former Ramtha School of Enlightenment teacher, This page was last edited on 13 February 2023, at 23:23. contact customer service After a successful DVD launch in March of 2005, Fox . Q: Obviously, quantum mechanics has lots of real-life applications, including in your television set and your microwave oven. He also has been marketing several products within the school and its followers. Hobbs further disputed the film's use of the ten percent of the brain myth. It's certainly not. It demands a freedom of view and greatness of thought so far unknown, indeed, not even dreamed of since Copernicus. And any Cognitive Behavioural Therapist can help us to change the way we see things by changing our thought patterns. Thus, if a scientist repeats an experiment with subatomic particles often enough, the results will closely match the probabilities quantum theory predicts. so much for no good or bad, that is unless it is convienent. : Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\09 What the Bleep.wav Peak level 100.0 % Extraction speed 8.6 X Track quality 100.0 % Test CRC 2A67087E Copy CRC 2A67087E Accurately ripped (confidence 4) [55AC2A89] (AR v1) Copy OK Track 10 Filename F:\torrent\What the Bleep Do We Know_2CD\disc one\10 Circle the Sun.wav Peak level 100.0 % Blech. Do we know" . But when you get hit with so much information that's been edited to within a frame of its life, things get a bit confusing. Publishers Weekly What the Bleep Do We Know!? That's not the case. As one of the film's characters gushes early in the proceedings, 'The moment we acknowledge the quantum self, we say that somebody has become enlightened'. Within several weeks, the film had appeared in a dozen or more theaters (mostly in the western United States), and within six months it had made its way into 200 theaters across the US. Science Monitor has expired. [4], Lacking the funding and resources of the typical Hollywood film, the filmmakers relied on "guerrilla marketing" first to get the film into theaters, and then to attract audiences. Unfortunately, it also completely misunderstands it. Isnt Langs viewpoint in line with the sort of criticism that string theory receives at this web site? But they add that the film shows quantum mysteries selectively to shore up metaphysical points. The weirdness of quantum mechanics is reserved for either very specially prepared configurations in the laboratory, or scales that are so small that quantum-mechanical effects are significant. : Down the Rabbit Hole: Directed by William Arntz, Betsy Chasse, Mark Vicente. And while I dont think supersymmetric GUTs are anywhere near as promising as many people seem to think, they are a much saner idea than many that dominate research these days (take the Landscape, please). No, that wasnt intended specifically as an attack on supersymmetric models; the fact that Hagelin worked on them isnt an argument for or against them. I remember Hagelin wanting to discuss how quantum field theory could explain how TMers were able to levitate, something about how they did this by changing the position of the pole in the propagator. In the film, during a discussion of the influence of experience on perception, Candace Pert notes a story, which she says she believes is true, of Native Americans being unable to see Columbus's ships because they were outside their experience.